tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37474993.post6672058625355925428..comments2024-01-13T11:31:45.396+01:00Comments on The bLOGOS: MM Chalmers: On Another MetaMetaphysical TaxonomyDan López de Sahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16716694655307652854noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-37474993.post-10540955163738827512007-03-08T20:11:00.000+01:002007-03-08T20:11:00.000+01:00I must confess that I thought that more important ...I must confess that I thought that more important to Chalmers’ purposes was the claim that philosophers use a different peculiar sort of existential quantifier, the “absolute existential quantifier” or “heavyweight quantifier”. Since this is a question that is addressed by Dan just indirectly I would find interesting if someone else agrees with me and gives an opinion about this issue (and then I’ll know that I’m not alone in my interpretation of the article.) Personally I found this hard to swallow, but maybe that’s because I would identify myself as a lightweight realist.... Of course, another interesting question is whether those who claim that ontological questions are not answerable a priori would accept Chalmers’ view on quantification in philosophical discourse...Oscar Cabacohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13326054531943637158noreply@blogger.com